Our diagnostic method isn't opinion dressed up as a framework. It draws on established, published research into how buyers actually decide, evaluate trust and drop out of a journey — refined against direct operating experience across automotive, clinic and travel verticals in Singapore and ASEAN. Below is a sample of the research categories and sources that inform how we think, grouped by what each addresses.
Buyer decision journeys aren't a straight line
Why we assess a full journey — visibility through retention — instead of just a landing page or a single funnel step.
Response speed matters more than most businesses assume
Why "how fast and how clearly do you respond" carries real weight in the scoring, independent of how good the product or service is.
Trust gets built before contact, not after
Why review behaviour, response patterns and verifiable credentials are weighted heavily before a prospect ever reaches out — especially in clinics and travel, where the research phase happens silently.
Friction is measurable, not just a feeling
Why specific, observable friction points — not a general "the site feels dated" impression — drive what gets flagged in a Snapshot.
What we don't publish here: the actual scoring weights, the 0/1/2 evidence thresholds per stage, and the vertical-specific rubrics themselves. That instrument — refined against real client work, not just published research — is what a Leak Snapshot and Full-Spectrum Audit actually deliver. This page shows the foundation it's built on, not the finished tool.